• about reply
Avantage Reply Logo
Menu
  • About Us
    About Us
    • About Us
    • History
    • Our Approach
    • Values
    • Alumni
    • Strategic Partners
    • Media Contacts
    • Contact Us
  • Our Capabilities
    Our Capabilities
    • Our Capabilities
    • Risk
    • Insurance
    • Finance
    • Conduct & Compliance
    • Technology
  • Newsroom
    Newsroom
    • Newsroom
    • News
    • Events
    • Press Articles
    • Blog
    • Academy
  • Publications
    Publications
    • Publications
    • Briefing Notes
    • Case Studies
    • CRO Insights Journals
    • Infographics
    • White Papers & Practical Guides
  • Career
    Career
    • Career
    • BELGIUM
    • FRANCE
    • ITALY
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • NETHERLANDS
    • UK
  • about Reply
Avantage Reply Logo

Search

Case Studies

Case Study

Pillar 3 gap analysis

FOCUS ON: Case studies,

SUMMARY

The client, a major banking group specialised in the provision of online banking and trading services, was required by its national competent authority to update its Pillar 3 report for the year-end 2020. In this context, the client asked Avantage Reply to perform a gap analysis of its 2019 Pillar 3 report against regulatory requirements in order to be able to provide the national supervisor with a fully compliant 2020 Pillar 3 report.

CUSTOMER GOALS

The Bank wanted to provide the national supervisor with a 2020 Pillar 3 report that was fully compliant with regulatory requirements and best market practices.

CHALLENGES

The key challenge faced by the team was to provide the Bank with an action plan for the design and implementation of its 2020 Pillar 3 report that was regulatory compliant, but more importantly, that was pragmatic and easy to be implemented by the Bank within the allocated timeline.

SOLUTION

In order to deliver on the objectives outlined in the customer goals section, Avantage Reply put together a team of CRR and Pillar 3 experts, which conducted the following tasks:

Performed a gap analysis of the Bank’s 2019 Pillar 3 report against the following key regulations:
  • Regulation EU 575/2013 (also known as “Capital Requirements Regulation” or “CRR”)
  • EBA guidelines 2016/11 on disclosure requirements

  • For each of the identified gap, the team provided the Bank with an action plan that was regulatory compliant, but also pragmatic and easy to be implement.

    RELATED CONTENTS

    Case Study

    Supporting daily ALM activity and reporting

    Avantage Reply assisted a Finance department of a well-known private bank in daily activity and reporting production of the Assets and Liabilities Management team. The key tasks were assist the team in the improvement and preparation of the Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP), advise on the regulatory requirements and contribute to the implementation of local.

    Case Study

    Testing of liquidity regulatory reporting in light of the new BO system

    Avantage Reply assisted a Finance department of a well-known private bank in the connectivity test phase within back office tool migration. The project covered a wide range of activities such as conducting multiple User Acceptance Tests (UAT) with on-shore teams, verify the impact of the change on regulatory reporting.

    Case Study

    Finance reporting support

    Avantage Reply assisted a Finance department of a well-known private bank in daily and monthly reporting production related to liquidity. The key tasks were: produce and certify various regulatory reports, such as LCR, AMT, NSFR incl. contributions to group consolidated reports; produce and certify integral liquidity reports based on inputs from various business line.

     ​
     
     ​
     
    Reply ©​​ 2023 - Company Information -
     Privacy Cookie Settings​
    • Abou​t Reply​​
    • Investors​​​
    • Newsroom
    • Follow Reply on
    • ​
    ​
    • ​About Avantage ​​Reply
    • Privacy & Cookies Policy
    • Information (Client)​
    • Information (Supplier)
    • Information (Candidate)