Operational Risk Scenarios and Stress Testing

FOCUS ON: Case studies,

SUMMARY

The client, a UK asset manager, provides services to both retail and institutional clients across different asset classes in the UK and the European market. It requested support to enhance the operational risk scenarios and stress testing framework as a part of the ICAAP.

CUSTOMER GOALS

Considering that operational risk was the largest component of the capital requirement for the client as well as the common area of regulatory focus, it was defined as one of the key areas for potential enhancement within the ICAAP exercise along with the stress testing process. Furthermore, the CRO was unconvinced that the existing approach and scenarios employed for operational risk assessment were appropriately designed and capturing all relevant risks, especially given the significant changes in the existing risk profile following a material increase of the business size. As a result, the client requested that Avantage Reply perform a comprehensive review of the scenarios and the framework.

CHALLENGES

Considering that at this point the client was going through significant changes related to the scale of the business, this had to be reflected in the stress testing scenarios, framework and related methodologies. The review process was particularly challenging given the need to organise a large number of operational risk scenario workshops with all the business lines remotely. In addition, the timelines were significantly shortened because the company had to undertake the ICAAP process twice during the same year to meet a regulatory request.

APPROACH AND SOLUTIONS

The approach adopted by Avantage Reply ensured that the operational risk framework and stress testing approach meet the regulatory requirements and are aligned with the industry best practice. It included the following steps:

Facilitate the operational risk scenario workshops and ensure that information provided by the SMEs is reflected in the respective scenarios;
Amend the existing scenarios by performing a detailed assessment of the inputs and assumptions and develop new stress scenarios to address the risk that were previously not captured;
Quantify the impact of each scenario including validating the accuracy of the implementation and perform respective capital requirements estimation;
Develop and document the respective sections of the ICAAP report, ensuring that the information provided is both coherent and comprehensive.

RELATED CONTENTS

Case Study

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS POLICY PROPOSAL

A leading trade association for the UK banking and financial services sector was looking to respond to one of the UK government bodies’ call for evidence on regulatory coordination in respect of recommendations for improving Cost/Benefit Analysis (CBA) by financial-services regulators in the UK. Avantage Reply was able to finalise the policy paper for the client to successfully submit their response to the UK regulator within the required timeframe.

Case Study

Transition to direct supervision by the European Central Bank

The ECB banking supervision is based on the same rules as local supervision (single rulebook), public information on the differences between both is not commonly available. While there are differences, these are on a practical level and only known to experts with insights on both locally and directly supervised banks. Avantage Reply prepared a review of these differences and the gaps of the client to these the previous year. The client wanted to have an update on these recommendations based on the progress that was made during the year, also with regard to the updated timeline to ECB supervision. To address these topics, Avantage Reply organised workshops with its subject matter experts and the client and reviewed the relevant documents provided by the client.