• about reply
Avantage Reply Logo
Menu
  • About Us
    About Us
    • About Us
    • History
    • Our Approach
    • Values
    • Alumni
    • Strategic Partners
    • Media Contacts
    • Contact Us
  • Our Capabilities
    Our Capabilities
    • Our Capabilities
    • Risk
    • Insurance
    • Finance
    • Conduct & Compliance
    • Technology
  • Newsroom
    Newsroom
    • Newsroom
    • News
    • Events
    • Press Articles
    • Blog
    • Academy
  • Publications
    Publications
    • Publications
    • Briefing Notes
    • Case Studies
    • CRO Insights Journals
    • Infographics
    • White Papers & Practical Guides
  • Career
    Career
    • Career
    • BELGIUM
    • FRANCE
    • ITALY
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • NETHERLANDS
    • UK
  • about Reply
Avantage Reply Logo

Search

Focus On

Case Study

Standardised Approach for Counterparty Credit Risk

FOCUS ON: Case studies,

SUMMARY

The client, a major banking group specialised in the provision of online banking and trading services, was in the process of launching new derivative products for its retail clients and required assistance with calculating the capital requirements for counterparty credit risk under the new standardised approach. This project was a continuation of similar work which Avantage Reply performed prior for this client, regarding the mark-to-market approach.

CUSTOMER GOALS

With limited time until the new CRR2 would come into force, the bank wanted to understand the exact steps and processes involved in calculating the following:

  • How to apply the Standardised Approach for Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR) for the new derivative products?
  • How to calculate the Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) charge for the new products?

CHALLENGES

The main challenges were two-fold:

  • The products had not been finalised at the time of the engagement, so a number of assumptions had to be made of the final state and processes to be conducted by the bank;
  • In order to give the bank enough time to implement the calculations before the CRR2 implementation deadline, the team had to deliver a month worth of work into just two weeks.

SOLUTION

The team had delivered the following:

  • A comprehensive excel tool showcasing the calculation steps for a variety of risk categories (i.e. FX, equity, commodity, interest rate);
  • A detailed explanatory memo describing each step of the calculation, the reasoning and assumptions behind it;
  • A workshop to answer any additional questions from the client.

RELATED CONTENTS

Case Study

Enhancement of Internal Rating Based Framework

The client, a major universal bank featuring a significant wealth management activity, was in the process of enhancing its IRB framework (Internal Ratings Based) following Basel IV requirements and feedback from the European Central Bank (ECB). This program has been launched to repair internal models used to calculate own funds requirements for credit risk under the Internal Ratings Based (IRB) approach.

Case Study

Remediation of the outsourcing control framework

In 2021, an internal systemic Bank launched a holistic risk assessment of its Depositary Bank (DB) business. As part of this review, Avantage Reply performed a review of DB exposure to risks related to outsourcing arrangements including the effectiveness of controls to mitigate associated risks.

Case Study

Testing and management of migration to a new accounting system

Avantage Reply assisted a Finance department of a well-known private bank in their migration to a new accounting system and in the early post-migration phase. The project covered a wide range of activities such as...

 ​
 
 ​
 
Reply ©​​ 2023 - Company Information -
 Privacy Cookie Settings​
  • Abou​t Reply​​
  • Investors​​​
  • Newsroom
  • Follow Reply on
  • ​
​
  • ​About Avantage ​​Reply
  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
  • Information (Client)​
  • Information (Supplier)
  • Information (Candidate)