Internal capital adequacy; assessment process (ICAAP) Design and Implementation

FOCUS ON: Case studies,

The client is a French multinational financial services firm specialised in asset & wealth management, corporate & investment banking, insurance and payments. It is a subsidiary of one of largest banking groups in France and its clients include corporations, financial institutions, sovereign and supranational organisations, and customers of the Group’s network.

THE CHALLENGE

The client wanted to comply with the ECB’s requirement and submission process, by implementing its first ICAAP. Key challenges included the need for strong governance, efforts of communications with the Senior Management, and the transversal dimension of the ICAAP process, taking account of the wide range of topics and stakeholders.

APPROACH AND SOLUTION

Our approach consisted of assessing the client’s current abilities to develop and implement an ICAAP framework. To do so, three steps were conducted, including a gap analysis on key identified blocks, a census of key findings and associated recommendations, and a multi-year roadmap. An action plan built around six key blocks to design the ICAAP framework was validated. Finally, the implementation phase was launched, leading to dedicated work per key workstreams in a very ambitious timeline:

Framing of a Business Model Analysis framework to link key institutions business lines to their profitability, solvency and risk profiles.
Design and implementation of a strong ICAAP governance and control framework (comitology, roles and responsibilities, validation process, etc.).
Design and implementation of a risk identification and materiality assessment process (risk inventory, materiality definition and grid assessment, risk events evaluation, link to key processes).
Subject matter support and design of risk quantification methodologies under the economic approach for Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 risks.
Set-up of a capital management framework, comprising governance, assessment, adequacy, planning and allocation.
Design of a linkage framework to describe and implement the key interactions between the ICAAP and other strategic processes.

RESULTS AND BENEFITS

The ICAAP framework has been completed in due time to comply with ECB’s submission process and fully aligned to market best practices and the latest supervisory requirements. In the end, the project has been enlarged, and Avantage Reply has been solicited to pursue its work related to the improvement of institutions’ capital management policy and allocation.

RELATED CONTENTS

Case Study

FRAUD RISK: AN EXAMPLE OF OPERATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT

The client, a crypto-currency exchange, has requested Avantage Reply to assist with an ongoing project around fraud risk. As the regulation around virtual asset service providers is not yet mature, the measurement of new and non-traditional operational risks is not an easy exercise. In fact, several players in the industry have recently found themselves being vehicles for the continuation of various financial crimes, including fraud. In the client landscape, scammers and individuals with malicious intentions have exploited the weaknesses of decentralized finance (DeFi) and have misappropriated even millions of dollars from their victims through first party or third party external fraud.

Case Study

Embedment of ICAAP & ILAAP exercise

Avantage Reply has assisted a Private Banking group in the Eurozone in their embedment of Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) & Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP) exercise, s.c. ICLAAP. Following the recommendation of the European Central Bank (ECB), bank’s current practice of ICLAAP had to be reviewed and challenged. The results of the review have been presented to the Management Body. In particular, identified gaps and attention points with respective actions to improve the way ICAAP and ILAAP are conducted. The analysis has been enriched with market best practices observed among various financial institutions in the Eurozone.