Internal capital adequacy; assessment process (ICAAP) Design and Implementation

FOCUS ON: Case studies,

The client is a French multinational financial services firm specialised in asset & wealth management, corporate & investment banking, insurance and payments. It is a subsidiary of one of largest banking groups in France and its clients include corporations, financial institutions, sovereign and supranational organisations, and customers of the Group’s network.

THE CHALLENGE

The client wanted to comply with the ECB’s requirement and submission process, by implementing its first ICAAP. Key challenges included the need for strong governance, efforts of communications with the Senior Management, and the transversal dimension of the ICAAP process, taking account of the wide range of topics and stakeholders.

APPROACH AND SOLUTION

Our approach consisted of assessing the client’s current abilities to develop and implement an ICAAP framework. To do so, three steps were conducted, including a gap analysis on key identified blocks, a census of key findings and associated recommendations, and a multi-year roadmap. An action plan built around six key blocks to design the ICAAP framework was validated. Finally, the implementation phase was launched, leading to dedicated work per key workstreams in a very ambitious timeline:

Framing of a Business Model Analysis framework to link key institutions business lines to their profitability, solvency and risk profiles.
Design and implementation of a strong ICAAP governance and control framework (comitology, roles and responsibilities, validation process, etc.).
Design and implementation of a risk identification and materiality assessment process (risk inventory, materiality definition and grid assessment, risk events evaluation, link to key processes).
Subject matter support and design of risk quantification methodologies under the economic approach for Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 risks.
Set-up of a capital management framework, comprising governance, assessment, adequacy, planning and allocation.
Design of a linkage framework to describe and implement the key interactions between the ICAAP and other strategic processes.

RESULTS AND BENEFITS

The ICAAP framework has been completed in due time to comply with ECB’s submission process and fully aligned to market best practices and the latest supervisory requirements. In the end, the project has been enlarged, and Avantage Reply has been solicited to pursue its work related to the improvement of institutions’ capital management policy and allocation.

RELATED CONTENTS

Case Study

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS POLICY PROPOSAL

A leading trade association for the UK banking and financial services sector was looking to respond to one of the UK government bodies’ call for evidence on regulatory coordination in respect of recommendations for improving Cost/Benefit Analysis (CBA) by financial-services regulators in the UK. Avantage Reply was able to finalise the policy paper for the client to successfully submit their response to the UK regulator within the required timeframe.

Case Study

Transition to direct supervision by the European Central Bank

The ECB banking supervision is based on the same rules as local supervision (single rulebook), public information on the differences between both is not commonly available. While there are differences, these are on a practical level and only known to experts with insights on both locally and directly supervised banks. Avantage Reply prepared a review of these differences and the gaps of the client to these the previous year. The client wanted to have an update on these recommendations based on the progress that was made during the year, also with regard to the updated timeline to ECB supervision. To address these topics, Avantage Reply organised workshops with its subject matter experts and the client and reviewed the relevant documents provided by the client.