Internal capital adequacy; assessment process (ICAAP) Design and Implementation

FOCUS ON: Case studies,

The client is a French multinational financial services firm specialised in asset & wealth management, corporate & investment banking, insurance and payments. It is a subsidiary of one of largest banking groups in France and its clients include corporations, financial institutions, sovereign and supranational organisations, and customers of the Group’s network.

THE CHALLENGE

The client wanted to comply with the ECB’s requirement and submission process, by implementing its first ICAAP. Key challenges included the need for strong governance, efforts of communications with the Senior Management, and the transversal dimension of the ICAAP process, taking account of the wide range of topics and stakeholders.

APPROACH AND SOLUTION

Our approach consisted of assessing the client’s current abilities to develop and implement an ICAAP framework. To do so, three steps were conducted, including a gap analysis on key identified blocks, a census of key findings and associated recommendations, and a multi-year roadmap. An action plan built around six key blocks to design the ICAAP framework was validated. Finally, the implementation phase was launched, leading to dedicated work per key workstreams in a very ambitious timeline:

Framing of a Business Model Analysis framework to link key institutions business lines to their profitability, solvency and risk profiles.
Design and implementation of a strong ICAAP governance and control framework (comitology, roles and responsibilities, validation process, etc.).
Design and implementation of a risk identification and materiality assessment process (risk inventory, materiality definition and grid assessment, risk events evaluation, link to key processes).
Subject matter support and design of risk quantification methodologies under the economic approach for Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 risks.
Set-up of a capital management framework, comprising governance, assessment, adequacy, planning and allocation.
Design of a linkage framework to describe and implement the key interactions between the ICAAP and other strategic processes.

RESULTS AND BENEFITS

The ICAAP framework has been completed in due time to comply with ECB’s submission process and fully aligned to market best practices and the latest supervisory requirements. In the end, the project has been enlarged, and Avantage Reply has been solicited to pursue its work related to the improvement of institutions’ capital management policy and allocation.

RELATED CONTENTS

Case Study

Implementing new ILAAP Handbook

The client wished to perform an enhanced gap-analysis of the organisation’s current ILAAP framework against the ECB and EBA guidelines as well as to use this information to design and implement an ILAAP Handbook/Framework document covering all in-scope entities. The final deliverable also included a detailed remediation roadmap, which helped the client and its entities to remediate and align their ILAAP processes across the Group in line with the regulatory and supervisory requirements.

Case Study

Review of Internal ratings methodologies

The project focused around the full review of the credit rating methodologies for non-financial counterparties, specifically models for sovereigns, corporates, funds and asset managers. The objective of the project was to test and document the credit rating methodologies to meet regulatory requirements and start the model validation process. Avantage Reply started the review with a pre-assessment of the rating model based on the best practices in order to identify the models’ gaps in different areas.