• about reply
Avantage Reply Logo
Menu
  • About Us
    About Us
    • About Us
    • History
    • Our Approach
    • Values
    • Alumni
    • Strategic Partners
    • Media Contacts
    • Contact Us
  • Our Capabilities
    Our Capabilities
    • Our Capabilities
    • Risk
    • Insurance
    • Finance
    • Conduct & Compliance
    • Technology
  • Newsroom
    Newsroom
    • Newsroom
    • News
    • Events
    • Press Articles
    • Blog
    • Academy
  • Publications
    Publications
    • Publications
    • Briefing Notes
    • Case Studies
    • CRO Insights Journals
    • Infographics
    • White Papers & Practical Guides
  • Career
    Career
    • Career
    • BELGIUM
    • FRANCE
    • ITALY
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • NETHERLANDS
    • UK
  • about Reply
Avantage Reply Logo

Search

Focus On

Case Study

ILAAP Support

FOCUS ON: Case studies,

SUMMARY

Following the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP), the bank received a letter from the Banque Centrale du Luxembourg (BCL) highlighting a number of findings and recommendations concerning its liquidity risk management framework. The bank was asked to address these recommendations as part of its submission of the 2021 Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP).

CUSTOMER GOALS

The bank’s Treasury team, who is responsible for the ILAAP, required assistance with enhancing its liquidity management framework and support in preparing its 2021 ILAAP report while implementing the SREP letter recommendations. The primary goals were the following:

  • Address the findings and recommendations identified by the BCL
  • Enhance relevant policies, procedures and frameworks to incorporate the changes required for the liquidity management processes
  • Assist in the preparation of the 2021 ILAAP report, including coordinating inputs required from key stakeholders (e.g. Risk Management, Finance, Treasury, etc.)
  • Develop a stand-alone Contingency Funding Plan (CFP)
  • Support the Treasury team with any other ad-hoc requests related to liquidity management

CHALLENGES

Avantage Reply had to 1) update last year’s ILAAP report from start to end, and 2) address the recommendations required by the BCL. The first objective was impeded by the lack of documentation and the previous person responsible for this report. This required extra time to understand the bank’s specificities. Secondly, most of the solutions had to be developed and approved prior to the update of the ILAAP, which required a practical and efficient working plan.

SOLUTION

Avantage Reply provided one full-time resource who led the project along with coordination of the ILAAP development and drafting of the report. The senior consultant provided the necessary technical and industry best market practices by developing custom-made solutions to address the comments from BCL. The final delivery consisted of:

  • An updated ILAAP report
  • A revised risk identification and quantification approach for the ILAAP
  • An updated ILAAP Reader’s Manual
  • An updated Liquidity Adequacy Statement
  • An updated Intraday Liquidity Policy
  • An updated Liquidity Risk Management Policy
  • A new Contingency Funding Plan
  • The Board of Directors and other relevant risk committees’ presentations, which described the key ILAAP elements to facilitate the approval process

RELATED CONTENTS

Case Study

Risk Support

Avantage Reply provided support to the Risk department of a custodian bank that operates at an international level. The goal was to help with the completion of the department’s daily tasks and any upcoming projects

Case Study

Risk Management Support

The client began a project to switch to a new core banking system and aimed to complete this transition quickly with minimal impact on their daily processes and duties.

Case Study

Internal Audit of the Recovery Plan

The client, an independent and privately-owned banking group which provides private banking services, wanted an external expert to support their internal audit team. In particular, the client wanted to review and provide assurance that their Group Recovery Plan is in line with the latest regulatory requirements and best market practices.

 ​
 
 ​
 
Reply ©​​ 2023 - Company Information -
 Privacy Cookie Settings​
  • Abou​t Reply​​
  • Investors​​​
  • Newsroom
  • Follow Reply on
  • ​
​
  • ​About Avantage ​​Reply
  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
  • Information (Client)​
  • Information (Supplier)
  • Information (Candidate)