• about reply
Avantage Reply Logo
Menu
  • About Us
    About Us
    • About Us
    • History
    • Our Approach
    • Values
    • Alumni
    • Strategic Partners
    • Media Contacts
    • Contact Us
  • Our Capabilities
    Our Capabilities
    • Our Capabilities
    • Risk
    • Insurance
    • Finance
    • Conduct & Compliance
    • Technology
  • Newsroom
    Newsroom
    • Newsroom
    • News
    • Events
    • Press Articles
    • Blog
    • Academy
  • Publications
    Publications
    • Publications
    • Briefing Notes
    • Case Studies
    • CRO Insights Journals
    • Infographics
    • White Papers & Practical Guides
  • Career
    Career
    • Career
    • BELGIUM
    • FRANCE
    • ITALY
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • NETHERLANDS
    • UK
  • about Reply
Avantage Reply Logo

Search

Focus On

Case Study

BACKTESTING LOSS GIVEN DEFAULT MODELS

FOCUS ON: Case studies,

SUMMARY

Avantage Reply supported a large European bank based in Luxembourg in automating the back-testing of their retail models. The bank had a manual and tedious process, which required a lot of manual manipulations.

Avantage Reply automated the whole process using Python thus saving the bank important resources and improving the overall test procedures and back-testing guidelines.

CUSTOMERS GOALS

The annual back-testing of retail models requires a lot of effort, in particular manual manipulations. The customer wanted to automate the whole process thus reducing the human effort and therefore improving the model’s performance if necessary.

THE CHALLENGE

To fully test a model, a sufficient amount of test data is required. In this case, the bank lacked an adequate amount of defaults data to test their Loss Given Default model.

APPROACH AND SOLUTION

Avantage Reply automated the whole back-testing process using Python. The automation process was based on the Bank’s current and historical portfolio composition and Data from Moody’s Default and Recovery Database (DRD). During the automation process, statistical tests such as T-test, Sign Test and Wilcoxon Test were performed on the observed and predicted values of the model using Python and were embedded for future back-tests. This contributed to improving the back-testing guidelines.

RELATED CONTENTS

Case Study

Supporting daily ALM activity and reporting

Avantage Reply assisted a Finance department of a well-known private bank in daily activity and reporting production of the Assets and Liabilities Management team. The key tasks were assist the team in the improvement and preparation of the Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP), advise on the regulatory requirements and contribute to the implementation of local.

Case Study

Testing of liquidity regulatory reporting in light of the new BO system

Avantage Reply assisted a Finance department of a well-known private bank in the connectivity test phase within back office tool migration. The project covered a wide range of activities such as conducting multiple User Acceptance Tests (UAT) with on-shore teams, verify the impact of the change on regulatory reporting.

Case Study

Finance reporting support

Avantage Reply assisted a Finance department of a well-known private bank in daily and monthly reporting production related to liquidity. The key tasks were: produce and certify various regulatory reports, such as LCR, AMT, NSFR incl. contributions to group consolidated reports; produce and certify integral liquidity reports based on inputs from various business line.

 ​
 
 ​
 
Reply ©​​ 2023 - Company Information -
 Privacy Cookie Settings​
  • Abou​t Reply​​
  • Investors​​​
  • Newsroom
  • Follow Reply on
  • ​
​
  • ​About Avantage ​​Reply
  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
  • Information (Client)​
  • Information (Supplier)
  • Information (Candidate)